Artificial Intelligence (AI) Risk Management Framework

AI Risk Management Framework

The Artificial Intelligence (AI) Risk Management Framework by NIST enables organizations designing, developing, deploying, or using AI systems to incorporate comprehensive AI Testing, Evaluation, Validation, and Verification (TEVV) practices, thereby managing the many risks of AI and promoting trustworthy and responsible development and use of AI systems.

The AI Risk Management Framework functions (GOVERN, MAP, MEASURE, MANAGE) can be applied to fit the interests and needs for organizations of all sizes and in all sectors.

GOVERN
The GOVERN function ensures policies, processes, procedures and practices across the organization related to the mapping, measuring and managing of AI risks are in place, transparent, and implemented effectively.

MAP
The MAP function establishes the context to frame risks related to an AI system. The AI lifecycle consists of many interdependent activities involving a diverse set of actors. The information gathered while carrying out the MAP function enables negative risk prevention and informs decisions for processes such as model management, as well as an initial decision about appropriateness or the need for an AI solution.

MEASURE
The MEASURE function employs quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method tools, techniques, and methodologies to analyze, assess, benchmark, and monitor AI risk and related impacts.

MANAGE
The MANAGE function entails allocating risk resources to mapped and measured risks on a regular basis and as defined by the GOVERN function. Risk treatment comprises plans to respond to, recover from, and communicate about incidents or events.

AID9
FunctionGOVERN
FIDGOV-2
Description

Accountability structures are in place so that the appropriate teams and individuals are empowered, responsible, and trained for mapping, measuring, and managing AI risks.

Category

Governance and Oversight

GIDGovern 2.2
Guidance

To enhance AI risk management adoption and effectiveness, organizations are encouraged to identify and integrate appropriate training curricula into enterprise learning requirements. Through regular training, AI actors can maintain awareness of:

- AI risk management goals and their role in achieving them.
- Organizational policies, applicable laws and regulations, and industry best practices and norms.

See [MAP 3.4]() and [3.5]() for additional relevant information.

Recommendations

- Establish policies for personnel addressing ongoing education about:
- Applicable laws and regulations for AI systems.
- Potential negative impacts that may arise from AI systems.
- Organizational AI policies.
- Trustworthy AI characteristics.
- Ensure that trainings are suitable across AI actor sub-groups - for AI actors carrying out technical tasks (e.g., developers, operators, etc.) as compared to AI actors in oversight roles (e.g., legal, compliance, audit, etc.).
- Ensure that trainings comprehensively address technical and socio-technical aspects of AI risk management.
- Verify that organizational AI policies include mechanisms for internal AI personnel to acknowledge and commit to their roles and responsibilities.
- Verify that organizational policies address change management and include mechanisms to communicate and acknowledge substantial AI system changes.
- Define paths along internal and external chains of accountability to escalate risk concerns.

Documentation

Organizations can document the following
- Are the relevant staff dealing with AI systems properly trained to interpret AI model output and decisions as well as to detect and manage bias in data?
- How does the entity determine the necessary skills and experience needed to design, develop, deploy, assess, and monitor the AI system?
- How does the entity assess whether personnel have the necessary skills, training, resources, and domain knowledge to fulfill their assigned responsibilities?
- What efforts has the entity undertaken to recruit, develop, and retain a workforce with backgrounds, experience, and perspectives that reflect the community impacted by the AI system?

AI Transparency Resources
- WEF Model AI Governance Framework Assessment 2020. [URL](https://www.pdpc.gov.sg/-/media/Files/PDPC/PDF-Files/Resource-for-Organisation/AI/SGModelAIGovFramework2.pdf)
- WEF Companion to the Model AI Governance Framework- 2020. [URL](https://www.pdpc.gov.sg/-/media/Files/PDPC/PDF-Files/Resource-for-Organisation/AI/SGIsago.pdf)
- GAO-21-519SP: AI Accountability Framework for Federal Agencies & Other Entities. [URL](https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-21-519sp)

Tasks

Governance, Training

Reference(s)

Off. Comptroller Currency, Comptroller’s Handbook: Model Risk Management (Aug. 2021). [URL](https://www.occ.gov/publications-and-resources/publications/comptrollers-handbook/files/model-risk-management/index-model-risk-management.html)

“Developing Staff Trainings for Equitable AI,” Partnership on Employment & Accessible Technology (PEAT, peatworks.org). [URL](https://www.peatworks.org/ai-disability-inclusion-toolkit/ai-disability-inclusion-resources/developing-staff-trainings-for-equitable-ai/)